Fix several typos (#1169)

Co-authored-by: isaacw <isaacw@nvidia.com>

media/docs/cute/0x_gemm_tutorial.md

@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ int bar()
 }
 ```
 
-"Static" is an unfortunately overloaded term in C++.  Sometimes it means "the opposite of instance," like a "static function" or "static member" of a class.  (Some programming languages, like Java, say "class method" to refer to a "static function of a class.")  That's not what we mean here.  Instead, we mean "part of a compile-time type."  For example, `Int<1>` encodes the value 1 at compile time, as part of the type of a templated class `Int<Value>`.  `Int<3>` and `Int<4>` have different types.  You can get the value of of the type like this: `Int<3>::value`.  (The `value` is a `static constexpr` member of the class, where "static" means "opposite of instance.")  As soon as you go from `Int<3>` to `Int<3>::value`, you've gone from (3) above (a compile-time value) to (2) above (a `constexpr` value).  In some situations, this may mean that the compiler treats it as a run-time value.
+"Static" is an unfortunately overloaded term in C++.  Sometimes it means "the opposite of instance," like a "static function" or "static member" of a class.  (Some programming languages, like Java, say "class method" to refer to a "static function of a class.")  That's not what we mean here.  Instead, we mean "part of a compile-time type."  For example, `Int<1>` encodes the value 1 at compile time, as part of the type of a templated class `Int<Value>`.  `Int<3>` and `Int<4>` have different types.  You can get the value of the type like this: `Int<3>::value`.  (The `value` is a `static constexpr` member of the class, where "static" means "opposite of instance.")  As soon as you go from `Int<3>` to `Int<3>::value`, you've gone from (3) above (a compile-time value) to (2) above (a `constexpr` value).  In some situations, this may mean that the compiler treats it as a run-time value.
 
 #### Strides