[diffusion] fix: fix the issue where the qwen-edit & wan model produces incorrect output during sequence parallelism (#13922)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ class QwenImagePipelineConfig(ImagePipelineConfig):
|
||||
return latents
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class QwenImageEditPipelineConfig(QwenImagePipelineConfig):
|
||||
"""Configuration for the QwenImageEdit pipeline."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -225,6 +225,13 @@ class SamplingParams:
|
||||
self.num_frames = 1
|
||||
self.data_type = DataType.IMAGE
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# NOTE: We must apply adjust_num_frames BEFORE the SP alignment logic below.
|
||||
# If we apply it after, adjust_num_frames might modify the frame count
|
||||
# and break the divisibility constraint (alignment) required by num_gpus.
|
||||
self.num_frames = server_args.pipeline_config.adjust_num_frames(
|
||||
self.num_frames
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Adjust number of frames based on number of GPUs for video task
|
||||
use_temporal_scaling_frames = (
|
||||
pipeline_config.vae_config.use_temporal_scaling_frames
|
||||
@@ -275,10 +282,6 @@ class SamplingParams:
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.num_frames = new_num_frames
|
||||
|
||||
self.num_frames = server_args.pipeline_config.adjust_num_frames(
|
||||
self.num_frames
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
self._set_output_file_name()
|
||||
self.log(server_args=server_args)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user